What I read of the Wall Street Journal is online now, so it's always a treat to find a real print edition at a hotel or in a business lobby. That's why as an avid newspaper fan, I feel we're losing something significant when the Detroit Free Press is delivered in hard copy only three times a week. Over the years, it's been tough enough to get reliable delivery of a Detroit paper in West Michigan. At this point, why bother with a print copy at all? As one readers puts it: "Your slogan 'On Guard for 177 years' will it need to be changed to 'On Guard some days of the week'." My gut reaction is to invest my outside-the-market subscription in the Freep, Chicago Tribune or NY Times Sunday-only edition. As long as the Grand Rapids Press keeps printing, there is local news -- which I also get from radio, TV and online. But it's important to hear voices outside of Grand Rapids that are more than a quick sound bite. But you can see why the Free Press is changing. Newspapers everywhere are gasping for breath as ad revenue tanks. And I take solace in Mike Wendland's perspective that it's a necessary, exciting step. But I wonder where professional reporters will go, how they'll reinvent themselves. Otherwise, how will we know what's going on in local government, business and community life? You can't boil it down to a few top headlines and the weather. Or can you? Other Freep readers weigh in. More |